A lawyer in a conflict of interest situation is not able to comply with the rules on transfer fees because that lawyer has not been able to work on the case or agree to be available for advice due to the conflict of interest. Florida Ethics Opinion 73-2 states that a law firm that referred a case due to a conflict of interest could only obtain the fair value of its services before the conflict occurred. Florida Ethics Opinion 89-1 similarly states that a lawyer who pronounces a case because of a dispute cannot receive a transfer fee because that attorney cannot assume ethical responsibility for representation or consult with the client. However, the notice states that the lawyer may receive adequate compensation for the work done before the conflict arose as long as the conflict did not exist at the beginning of the representation. If, at the beginning of the representation, the dispute was such that the lawyer should not have taken over the representation, Opinion 89-1 states that the lawyer cannot receive part of the fees ethically, given that the conflict does not allow the lawyer to comply with rule 4-1.5 (g), given that the lawyer can neither work nor give his agreement on the case, assume joint legal responsibility and agree to consult with the client. Non-lawyers in your network can also be valuable sources for attracting new clients. However, it is important to take into account the rules of exclusivity and agreements. For the purposes of the professional rules, referral fees are considered to be royalty services. This article uses the term “recommendation fee” because it is the most frequently used term. The starting point for return shipping costs is Rule 4-1.5 (g) . . .